CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (151W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 Duo
+123%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
216
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GT200
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
151W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon R7 360
3
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM
4
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
5
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
6
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs ATI Radeon HD 3550
7
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
8
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
9
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
10
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD FirePro V5900
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy