CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
VS
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
+246%
4.156 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
VS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GK110B
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
151W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon R7 360
3
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM
4
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
5
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
6
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs ATI Radeon HD 3550
7
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
8
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 1440SP Edition
9
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
10
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy