Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI FireGL V8650

ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
480 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 +172%
1.2 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

151W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
R600
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy