Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 +92%
1.2 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Feb 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

151W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Turks
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy