Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI FirePro V4900

ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 +56%
1.2 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
6
800
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Turks
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy