Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (151W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 +123%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
800
Shading Units
216
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GT200
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy