Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X +64%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
115W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Bonaire
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy