Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (25W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750 +5900%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
800
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.080 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.68 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

151W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GT218
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
8400GS-225-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy