Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (106W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750 +166%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
800
Shading Units
144
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
106W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GF106
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy