Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +4%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Lexa
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy