Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM +34%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Tobago
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy