Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
CMP 70HX +305%
10.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1600
Shading Units
3840
80
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
30
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
167.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.71 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.71 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
167.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GA104
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GA104-100-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy