Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD FireStream 9270

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +120%
2.64 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
800
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV770
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy