Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (208W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +324%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1600
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
219W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
G92B
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy