Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (160W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +180%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
1600
Shading Units
336
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.814 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
941.5 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GF104
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy