Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +44%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GM206
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy