Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 208W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2004
FirePro
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1600
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
NV41
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy