Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1480 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +1275%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

208W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV630
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV630 XT (215CDABKA15FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy