Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +182%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4750
0.934 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2009
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.68 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
934.4 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
186.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV740
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV740 PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy