Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +307%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Vega 10
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy