Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +250%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 23
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy