Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +268%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy