Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon RX 460

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon RX 460

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +22%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 460
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2016
FirePro
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Baffin
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy