Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Sky 900

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Sky 900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon Sky 900 +28%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Sky
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Orthrus
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy