Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
4544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +912%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
20
Compute Units
-
1600
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
AD104
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
130W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy