Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro S7150

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +38%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Feb 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Tonga
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy