Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro W2100

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +525%
2.72 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
5
1600
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Oland
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
26W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy