Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (84W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +930%
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Apr 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1600
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
84W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
G92
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy