Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +649%
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jul 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1600
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
G92B
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy