Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +211%
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
0.874 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Oct 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
1600
Shading Units
336
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.100 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
873.6 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GF104
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GF104-325-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy