Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 +174%
7.465 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Oct 2018
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
1600
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.7 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
233.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.93 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.465 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
233.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
TU106
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
TU106-400A-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy