Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +237%
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Oland
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy