Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 640SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +129%
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 640SP
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2019
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy