Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +70%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
May 2020
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 14
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy