Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +29%
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 896SP
2.106 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jul 2017
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy