Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +2271%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
84
1600
Shading Units
5376
80
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
84
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 31
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy