Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
44W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV535
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy