Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GA107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy