Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800P vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

ATI FirePro V9800P vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800P and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
17856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800P
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +2904%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Oct 2024
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
750W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
153 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy