Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 107% (1410MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +2803%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
320
Shading Units
4480
20
TMUs
280
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy