Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA T600

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 40W)
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 96% (1335MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
T600 +292%
1.709 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
320
Shading Units
640
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy