Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (26W vs 135W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (52.48GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100 +4%
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
320
Shading Units
128
20
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

26W
TDP
135W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy