Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (26W vs 29W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100 +178%
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
29W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy