Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 114% (1455MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 +328%
1.862 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1354 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
320
Shading Units
640
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.10 GFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.862 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
58.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy