Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 134% (1590MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +554%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
320
Shading Units
896
20
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy