Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA P102 101

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA P102 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 146% (1670MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
P102 101 +2357%
10.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2018
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
320
Shading Units
3200
20
TMUs
200
8
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy