Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +1217%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2816
20
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy