Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 109% (1420MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 GME +1404%
6.543 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2020
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1257 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1420 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2304
20
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.44 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
204.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.543 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.543 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
409.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy