Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (1440MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +2272%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
3584
20
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

26W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy