Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +187%
1.267 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
R600
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy